To mitigate that risk, transplant programs could elect to move candidates to temporary inactive status, which is designed for those patients who are not immediately eligible for transplant due to medical factors that would decrease the success of transplant. Inactive candidates do not receive organ offers.
For kidney and pancreas candidates, moving to temporary inactive status has no impact on their ability to continue to accrue wait time. But for heart, lung (at least 12 years old), liver, intestine and vascularized composite allograft (VCA) organ candidates, moving to inactive status means halting wait time accrual (per OPTN Policy 3.6.A: Waiting Time for Inactive Candidates).
As a result, those patients face a choice between risking exposure to the virus or not continuing to accrue valuable time on the waitlist.
In response, UNOS staff and OPTN members worked together to develop a solution. In April, they recommended that non-kidney and pancreas transplant programs that opt to defer offers for certain candidates due to COVID-19 should not inactivate the candidate, but instead change their organ acceptance criteria.
To temporarily ensure that they are screened from matches but continue to accrue waiting time, the guidance that was created suggests setting specific donor age acceptance criteria to 98 years (minimum) and 99 years (maximum) for local and import offers.
Between March 22 and April 30 transplant programs utilized the recommended donor age setting for up to 692 registrations.
This change protected the following registrations on the waitlist, by organ type:
- 396 heart registrations
- 203 liver registrations
- 89 lung registrations
- 4 intestine registrations
Read more about this, and the other emergency operational actions taken by the OPTN to protect transplant patients during COVID-19.
Data show transplants for four major ethnic groups rebounded after initial decline, Hispanics had steepest decline and smallest rebound.
Data shows that the proportion of en bloc transplants to low EPTS patients more than doubled after implementation.
Analyzing the impact of transplant policy and system modifications in response to the COVID-19 pandemic
Data reveals the community’s continued commitment to provide the best care to their patients.